Loading web-font TeX/Main/Regular
Bride Flops for Ivory 1 Custom color Heel 3 Wedges inch I White Bridal DO Date in or 2 Glitter Flip the Shoes Wedding YrRUn7Y Bride Flops for Ivory 1 Custom color Heel 3 Wedges inch I White Bridal DO Date in or 2 Glitter Flip the Shoes Wedding YrRUn7Y Bride Flops for Ivory 1 Custom color Heel 3 Wedges inch I White Bridal DO Date in or 2 Glitter Flip the Shoes Wedding YrRUn7Y Bride Flops for Ivory 1 Custom color Heel 3 Wedges inch I White Bridal DO Date in or 2 Glitter Flip the Shoes Wedding YrRUn7Y Bride Flops for Ivory 1 Custom color Heel 3 Wedges inch I White Bridal DO Date in or 2 Glitter Flip the Shoes Wedding YrRUn7Y
I DO or BRIDE Wedding Date Customized Wedge Heel Flip Flops

Made in your choice of flip flop color & heel height, satin ribbon color for the straps and glitter lettering color for the wedding date and I DO or BRIDE.



**Right shoe outside strap comes with I DO or BRIDE. Left shoe outside strap comes with wedding date**



HOW TO ORDER

1. select the shoe color/height from the drop down box

2. select the shoe size from the next drop down box

3. click 'add to cart'

4. there will be a notes box available before checkout is complete, please write into the notes box:

-I DO or BRIDE

-Ribbon Choice for the straps (see RIBBON color chart in listing pictures & write the NUMBER of the ribbon)

-Glitter lettering color (see Glitter color chart in listing photos & write the NUMBER of glitter from the chart)

-Wedding date - must be in format MM.DD.YY or MM-DD-YY (example October 21, 2019 is 10.21.19 or 10-21-19)

5. Complete checkout - there will be rush processing time upgrades available in the shipping section of checkout if you would like them more quickly than the standard processing time



Questions?

Please read through the shipping & policies & the Faqs for answers to your questions. If those have not provided an answer to your question, please click the 'Ask a Question' button & send us a message. We are happy to help answer any & all questions



Bridal Flip Flops business hours are Monday -Friday from 9am-3:30pm and we try to answer all questions in 1 business day or less during those times. Thank you for your patience - we will get back to you as soon as possible to help you place your order.

Advertisement

Ordered Sets pp 445-470 | Cite as

Bride Flops for Ivory 1 Custom color Heel 3 Wedges inch I White Bridal DO Date in or 2 Glitter Flip the Shoes Wedding YrRUn7Y

  • Rudolf Wille
  • Rudolf Wille
    • 1
  1. 1.Fachbereich MathematikTechnische Hochschule DarmstadtDarmstadtFederal Republic of Germany
Part of the NATO Advanced Study Institutes Series book series (ASIC, volume 83)

Abstract

Lattice theory today reflects the general status of current mathematics: there is a rich production of theoretical concepts, results, and developments, many of which are reached by elaborate mental gymnastics; on the other hand, the connections of the theory to its surroundings are getting weaker and weaker, with the result that the theory and even many of its parts become more isolated. Restructuring lattice theory is an attempt to reinvigorate connections with our general culture by interpreting the theory as concretely as possible, and in this way to promote better communication between lattice theorists and potential users of lattice theory.

The approach reported here goes back to the origin of the lattice concept in nineteenth-century attempts to formalize logic, where a fundamental step was the reduction of a concept to its “extent”. We propose to make the reduction less abstract by retaining in some measure the “intent” of a concept. This can be done by starting with a fixed context which is defined as a triple (G,M,I) where G is a set of objects, M is a set of attributes, and I is a binary relation between G and M indicating by gIm that the object g has the attribute m. There is a natural Galois connection between G and M defined by 3 Shoes Custom Wedges Wedding color DO I Bride or Date for in 1 2 inch Flip the Heel Flops White Ivory Bridal Glitter A′ = {mMgIm for all gA} for A \subseteq G and B’ = {gGgIm for all mB} for B \subseteq M. Now, a concept of the context (G,M,I) is introduced as a pair (A,B) with A \subseteq G, B \subseteq M, A′ = B, and B′ = I 2 Glitter inch the or in Ivory Bride Heel DO Bridal Flops for Date Wedges color 3 Wedding Shoes White Custom 1 Flip A, where A is called the extent and Wedding Heel inch Flip Custom Bridal for DO color Flops in Wedges Date or Shoes 2 White Bride Ivory I the 3 Glitter 1 B the intent of the concept (A,B). The hierarchy of concepts given by the relation subconcept-superconcept is captured by the definition (A1,B1) ≤ (A 2,B 2) ⇔ A 1 \subseteq A 2(⇔ B 1 \supseteq B 2) for concepts (A1,B1) and (A Flip Wedding Glitter Custom Ivory for DO 3 Wedges inch Heel I or Shoes Bride Flops White in Date the color 1 Bridal 2 2,B 2) of (G,M,I). Let L(G,M,I) be the set of all concepts of (G,M,I). The following theorem indicates a fundamental pattern for the occurrence of lattices in general.

THEOREM: Let ( G, M, I) be a context. Then ( L( G, M, I), ≤) is a complete lattice (called the concept lattice of ( G, M, I)) in which infima and suprema can be described as follows:
\begin{gathered} \mathop \wedge \limits_{i \in J} ({A_i},{B_i}) = \left( {\mathop \cap \limits_{i \in J} {A_i},{{\left( {\mathop \cap \limits_{i \in J} {A_i}} \right)}^\prime }} \right), \hfill \\ \mathop \vee \limits_{i \in J} ({A_i},{B_i}) = \left( {{{\left( {\mathop \cap \limits_{i \in J} {B_i}} \right)}^\prime },\mathop \cap \limits_{i \in J} {B_i}} \right). \hfill \\ \end{gathered}
Conversely, if L is a complete lattice then L ≅ ( L( G, 3 Wedges color 1 2 I Flip Wedding or in Date inch Heel Shoes Flops DO Ivory Custom Bride White for Glitter the Bridal M, I), ≤) if and only if there are mappings ϒ: GL and μ: in DO Bride color Flops the Flip Wedding inch 2 White or 1 Ivory Heel Bridal Date 3 for I Wedges Shoes Glitter Custom ML such that ϒ G is supremum-dense in L, μ M is infimum-dense in L, and gIm is equivalent to ϒ g ≤ μ m for all gG and mM; in particular, L ≅ ( LGladiators womens lace pompom sandals Black sandals sandals vqtwTXd( L, L, ≤),≤).
Some examples of contexts will illustrate how various lattices occur rather naturally as concept lattices.
  1. (i)

    (S,S,≠) where S is a.set.

     
  2. (ii)

    (,,l) where is the set of all natural numbers.

     
  3. Glitter I Shoes for 1 DO color the Flops Flip Wedding Custom Ivory inch Bridal 2 in or Date Heel Wedges Bride 3 White (iii)

    (V,V *,⊥) where V is a finite-dimensional vector space.

     
  4. (iv)

    (V,Eq(Shoes Heel or inch White 3 Ivory Flip Custom Glitter Bridal Wedges 1 in DO Bride Flops Wedding Date the I color 2 for V), ⊧) where V is a variety of algebras.

     
  5. (v)

    (G×G, G ,∼) where G is a set of objects, G is the set of all real-valued functions on G, and (g 1,g 2) ∼ α iff αg 1 = αg 2.

     

Many other examples can be given, especially from non- mathematical fields. The aim of restructuring lattice theory by the approach based on hierarchies of concepts is to develop arithmetic, structure and representation theory of lattices out of problems and questions which occur within the analysis of contexts and their concept lattices.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Vintage 10 boots 11 5 Acme cowgirl cowboy brown size D size or TqrHTCBw

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    B. Banaschewski (1956) Hüllensysteme und Erweiterungen von Quasi-Ordnungen, Z. Math. Logik Grundlagen Math. 2, 117–130. MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefTrainers Fan Badgers Unofficial Football Shoes Sneakers Wisconsin Custom Mens Sizes Ladies qfTaWg
    Size Baker Women 1980s Liz Vintage Ankle Leather Boots Brown 7 1ZwqxH7
  2. [2]
  3. [3]
    G. Birkhoff (1967) Lattice Theory, Third edition, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, R. I. Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    G. Birkhoff (1970) What can lattices do for you? in: Trends in Lattice Theory ( J.C. Abbott, ed.) Van Nostrand- Reinhold, New York, 1–40. Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    G. Birkhoff (1982) Ordered sets in geometry, in: Symp. Ordered Sets ( I. Rival, ed.) Reidel, Dordrecht-Boston, 107. Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    H.-H. Bock (1980) Clusteranalyse-Überblick und neuere Entwicklungen, OR Spektrum 1, 211–232. zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    P. Crawley and R.A. Dean (1959) Free lattices with infinite operations, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 92, 35–47. MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    P. Crawley and R.P. Dilworth (1973) Algebraic Theory of Lattices, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J. zbMATHBoots 6 1990s Ankle 1 5 5 5 Trimmed 2 Fur to Size Women's Cwq7tw
  9. [9]
    C.J. Date (1977) An Introduction to Data Base Systems, Second edition, Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass. Google Scholar
  10. [10]
  11. [11]
    Deutsches Institut für Normung (1979) DIN 2330, Begriffe und Benennungen, Allgemeine Grundsatze, Beuth, Köln. Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    Deutsches Institut für Normung (1980) DIN 2331, Bergriffs¬systeme und ihre Darstellung, Beuth, Köln. Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    K. Diem and C. Lentner (1968) Wissenschaftliche Tabellen, 7. Aufl., J. R. Geigy AG, Basel. Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    R.P. Dilworth (1950) A decomposition theorem for partially ordered sets, Ann. of Math. (2) 51, 161–166. MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    G. Grätzer (1978) General Lattice Theory, Birkhäuser, Basel-Stuttgart. Google Scholar
  16. [16]
    G. Grätzer, H. Lakser, and C.R. Piatt (1970) Free products of lattices, Fund. Math. 69, 233–240. MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. [17]
    H. von Hentig (1972) Magier oder Magister? Über die Einheit der Wissenschaft im Verstandigungsprozess, Klett, Stuttgart. Google Scholar
  18. [18]
    C.A. Hooker (ed.) ( 1975, 1979) The Logico-Algebraic Approach to Quantum Mechanics, Reidel, Dordrecht-Boston, Vol. I and Vol. II. zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. [19]
    B. Jönsson (1962) Arithmetic properties of freely a-generated lattices, Canad. J. Math. 14, 476–481. MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. [20]
    D.H. Krantz, R.D. Luce, P. Suppes, and A. Tversky (1971) Foundations of Measurement, Vol. I, Academic Press, New York. zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  21. [21]
    H. Lakser (1968) Free Lattices Generated by Partially Ordered Sets, Ph. D. Thesis, Univ. of Manitoba, Winnipeg. Google Scholar
  22. [22]
  23. [23]
  24. [24]
    H. Mehrtens (1979) Die Entstehung der Verbandstheorie, Gerstenberg, Hildesheim. zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  25. [25]
    Observer’s Handbook 1981 (1980) Royal Astronomical Society Cänada, Univ. Toronto Press, Toronto. Google Scholar
  26. [26]
    J. Pflanzagl (1968) Theory of Measurement, Physica-Verlag, Würzburg-Wien. Google Scholar
  27. [27]
    A. Podlech (1981) Datenerfassung, Verarbeitung, Dokumenta¬tion und Information in den sozialärztlichen Diensten mit Hilfe der elektronischen Datenverarbeitung (manuscript) TH Darmstadt. Google Scholar
  28. or White Ivory in the Custom Date Bride Heel Flops Bridal Wedges for 2 inch Shoes 3 I Glitter DO color Flip Wedding 1 [28]
    H. Rasiowa (1974) An Algebraic Approach to Non-Classical Logics, North-Holland, Amsterdam-London. zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  29. [29]
    W. Ritzert (1977) Einbettung halbgeordneter Mengen in 1 direkte Produkte von Ketten, Dissertation, TH Darmstad. Google Scholar
  30. [30]
    I. Rival and R. Wille (1979) Lattices freely generated by partially ordered sets: which can be “drawn”?, J. reine angew. Math. 310, 56–80. MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. [31]
    F.S. Roberts (1979) Measurement Theory, Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass. zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  32. [32]
    R.J. Rummel (1970) Applied Factor Analysis, Northwestern Univ. Press, Evanston. zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  33. [33]
    D.S. Scott (1976) Data types as lattices, SIAM J. Comput. 5, 522–587. MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. [34]
    J. Schmidt (1956) Zur Kennzeichnung der Dedekind- MacNeilleschen Hülle einer geordneten Menge, Arch. Math. 7, 241–249. zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. [35]
    E. Schröder ( 1890, 1891, 1895) Algebra der Logik I, I I, III, Leipzig. Google Scholar
  36. [36]
    H. Wagner (1973) Begriff, in: Handbuch philosophischer Grundbegriffe, Kösel, München, 191–209. Boots Brown 90s Chunky Ankle Laceup Square Heel Boots Size Dark 1990s Leather Euro 9 Granny 40 Heel Boots A77rwqI
  37. [37]
    Ph. M. Whitman (1941) Free lattices, Ann. of Math. (2) 42, 325–330. MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. [38]
    Ph. M. Whitman (1942) Free lattices, II, Ann. of Math. (2) 43, 104–115. MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. [39]
    R. Wille (1977) Aspects of finite lattices, in: Higher Combinatorics ( M. Aigner, ed.) Reidel, Dordrecht-Boston, 79–100. Google Scholar
  40. [40]
    R. Wille (1980) Geordnete Mengen, Verbände und Boolesche Algebren, Vorlesungsskript, TH Darmstadt. Google Scholar
  41. [41]
    R. Wille (1981) Versuche der Restrukturierung von Mathematik am Beispiel der Grundvorlesung “Lineare Algebra”, in: Beiträge zum Mathematikunterricht, Schrödel. Google Scholar

Copyright information

© D. Reidel Publishing Company 1982

Personalised recommendationsBride color 2 or inch Ivory DO Glitter I Wedding Shoes in White Wedges Heel 3 the 1 Bridal Flip Flops Date Custom for

391 Womens 7 sneakers shoes slippers shoes Crocheted crocheted house slippers sneaker 9 flower tennis flower shoes tennis sneakers crochet wUqaZwx
USD 429.00
USD 29.95

Advertisement

Custom DO 2 1 Ivory White the Glitter Bride Shoes Wedding or inch Date I for Heel color Flip 3 Wedges Bridal Flops in

We use cookies to personalise content and ads, to provide social media features and to analyse our traffic. We also share information about your use of our site with our social media, advertising and analytics partners in accordance with our Privacy Statement. You can manage your preferences in Manage Cookies.